Monday, November 30, 2009

Sands IPO Continues to Highlight Macau Risks (LVS, WYNN, MPEL, MGM)

Las Vegas Sands Corp. (NYSE: LVS) failed to see any huge boost of its Asian asset IPO in Hong Kong.  Shares fell 10% on its debut that raised about $2.5 billion.  Sands China Ltd. closed down at 9.32 Hong Kong dollars, but shares had initially dropped under the 9-Dollar handle before recovering.  The pricing was at 10.38 in Hong Kong dollars, and this was near the lower-end of its price range.

Wynn Resorts Limited (NASDAQ: WYNN) has already gotten its IPO behind it, and frankly that came out when investors were more inclined to nibble on what many might consider a tracking stock rather than a fully independent operation.  We had recently noted how investor reactions posed a risk to Las Vegas Sands after the recent Melco Crown Entertainment Ltd. (NASDAQ: MPEL) earnings report was good but was received coldly.

We had penciled in approximately $3.0 to $3.3 billion as the planned capital raise from the IPO that would then go toward restarting construction of its large Macau project and paying down debt.

Sheldon Adelson tried to note that the one day reception is not any indication of the long-term prospects.  But it seems that there were a couple of issues.  The price was higher in a post-bubble world than some might have felt comfortable with.  Another issue is that this IPO came out at a time when Dubai has added to the global headline risk aversion.  These may not be directly tied, but that is the new world for you.

Another issue to consider is that the Las Vegas Sands operation is effectively “betting the come” as the construction is supposed to resume in early 2010.  There is already a flurry of competition, and recent regulation and the risk of future regulation could at any moment limit the number of Chinese gamers who can head to Macau.  That is deemed as a lower risk, but a risk nonetheless.

MGM Mirage (NYSE: MGM) may have the most to lose now if there is not a welcome rug laid out this week and next to this Sands IPO, as it is still a ways out from any formal IPO there.  Las Vegas Sands Corp. (NYSE: LVS) is down only about 1% at $15.62 right before the open.

Jon C. Ogg

November 30, 2009

[Via http://247wallst.com]

Sunday Salon: the Belated Post

The Sunday Salon.comI wasn’t going to post today; on Thanksgiving we got some bad family news, and since then I’ve been too distracted to really get into blogging. But I’ve been reading a lot this week (hmmm…I wonder why? it couldn’t be that books are my comfort and escape, lol), and now I want to distract myself from what’s going on. And what better way to do that than in a ridiculously long Sunday Salon post? Last Sunday, I didn’t do a TSS, but I only read 4 books that I hadn’t reviewed (one of those I reviewed this week). But this week, I’ve read 18 books, which would mean talking about twenty-one books in one post. So I went through and found some I could do ‘theme’ posts on, which got it down to 14.

First up, I read Baby of the Family by Tina McElroy Ansa. This was originally on my R.I.P. IV list, and even though that challenge ended last month, this book sounded too good to ignore. It’s set in the 1950s, and follows Lena McPherson’s childhood. She was born with a caul over her face, which means that she can see ghosts. Here’s the thing about this book: Ansa has a wonderful writing style. She brings characters and settings to life seemingly effortlessly, and the story just flows. But this isn’t really a book about ghosts. They only make a couple of minor appearances, which really disappointed me. If it had been described as a coming-of-age story, I think I would have enjoyed it more, rather than impatiently waiting for the ghosts to appear. And Ansa has decided to capture Lena’s life from birth to adolescence-this is a large amount of time for a short book, so sometimes a chapter would simply begin several years later, and then go back to Lena’s memories, which left me feeling disoriented. That being said, I still loved how Ansa brought me into the life of an upper middle class African American family in Georgia, and how real Lena felt. So I’m happy I read the book, and I’ll be reading more Ansa in the future, but I would recommend this as a coming-of-age story rather than a ghost one. It’d be a great choice for the Southern Reading Challenge, assuming Maggie holds it again next summer!

Then I finished Saudi Arabia Exposed by John Bradley for the World Citizen Challenge: it’s a book about modern Saudi Arabia, especially its politics. I loathed this book, and I don’t recommend it at all. Bradley brings a lot of personal prejudices to his writing, and I didn’t find him reliable, which is a problem in a nonfiction book. But I was willing to keep reading, to find the few grains of truth in all that chaff. Then I got to the chapter about women in Saudi Arabia, and my blood pressure went through the roof. He kept saying ridiculous, ignorant things that just pissed me off. And I thought, if he has this little ability to imagine life from a woman’s perspective, he probably doesn’t have any ability to analyse Saudi men either. And that wasn’t all-the way he talked about the expats revealed a disturbing classicm, and his discussion of homosexuality left something to be desired as well. Obviously, I can’t get into a play-by-play analysis in a paragraph, but I really, really don’t recommend it.

I finally got The Woman in Black by Susan Hill, and I couldn’t wait long after I’d brought it home from the library to open it up. This is a really popular ghost story in the book blogosphere, but one I couldn’t find at either of my libraries (when I lived in CA last year) or any bookstores. Finally, I decided to try ILLing it, despite only 20-something libraries in the US having it, and it worked! :) When I saw how slim it was, I decided to count it as part of the November Novella Challenge. Anyway, this is a Victorian-style ghost story, and I really enjoyed it! It’s a lot better than the other Hill book I’ve read (The Man in the Portrait)-while the tone of the book stays faithful to Hill’s chosen style, it feels less formulaic. The build-up of tension and atmosphere was handled marvelously. That being said, the book post-plot climax lost something. I think Hill over-explained the origins of the ghost, and the ending was a bit of letdown. But most of the book was a delicious, fun read, and I definitely recommend this one if you enjoy gothic books or Victorian ghost stories. I wish I could go see the play based on it-I bet it’s marvelous!

I picked up Ali and Nino by Kurban Said because I’d never read a bok by an Azerbaijani author. Said’s origins are misty-it’s a pseudonym that’s commonly accepted to be that of an Azerbaijani Lev Nussimbaum. The book is set in Baku, and apparently the Azerbaijani government feels that it’s a ‘national novel.’ So who am I to disagree with all that? Well, all I can say is that the whole time I was reading this book, it felt like it was written by a western European author pretending to be a Muslim. The book is narrated by Ali, a Muslim Azerbaijani who comes of age just as Azerbaijan is getting its independence (which the USSR promptly squashed) and is in love with Nino, who is a Christian Georgian by heritage, although she was born and raised in Azerbaijan. So the main story is their love, with all of the politics as a backdrop. But the way that Ali discusses his ‘oriental’ side, the dichotomy of his country, etc. just felt like a Westerner looking in. Ali never felt real, more like a political construct. And because of that, I didn’t enjoy this book a whole bunch. I’d maybe recommend it if you’re curious about the Caucauses during that time period, but don’t expect a wonderful story. And if you’ve read it, did it feel Western to you? Or geniune?

I put Ruined by Paula Morris on hold, because it was set in New Orleans and about ghosts! I read it when I was feeling sick, and it’s written so simply that it was easy to follow. I wouldn’t call this YA so much as middle grade fiction, and while it took me out of myself, it lacked enough sophistication for me to highly recommend it. I think if I had read it when I was 10, I would have loved it though. There’s a creepy cemetary, a ghost, a private school, and lots of mean rich New Orleans ‘old money’ famillies. Doesn’t that feel stereotypical? And it is: the story unfolds exactly as I would have expected it to. But it was a nice distraction when my brain was all foggy from fibro-it wasn’t a bad book, just too young for my tastes.

I loved Annie John by Jamaica Kincaid, which I read for the Caribbean Lit Challenge. As I mentioned in a Library Loot vlog, I’ve been avoiding Kincaid because I had her confused with Jean Rhys (I didn’t like The Wide Sargasso Sea, and it wasn’t because I’m attached to the original Jane Eyre characters, since I don’t really like that book either), so when I finally figured out my mistake, I decided to start with her first published novel. It actually reminded me of Colette’s Claudine at School, but set in the Caribbean instead of rural France. Annie John is a precocious school girl, who describes her life on the island and how she changes during adolescence. Annie’s combination of flippancy and know-it-all-ness was just so perfectly teenager I loved it. Kincaid has a real gift for narrative voice! There isn’t much a plot-this is more a book that brings you into day-to-day life, which I appreciated since it was a different culture. I highly recommend this one, and I’ll definitely be reading more Kincaid soon!

Aura by Carlos Fuentes was one of my choices for the November Novella Challenge; I’m not sure what I was expecting, but it wasn’t what I got! Imagine Angela Carter mixed with Gabriel Garcia Marquez and that might give you a good idea of tone. It’s narrated in second-person, which is always a bit of a risk, but Fuentes pulls it off. And the story is like some dark, delicious fairy tale. I’m not going to tell you anymore about it, because it’s so slim (my book was 160 pages, but it was dual language, so the English bit was 80 pages), but this was my introduction to Fuentes and I definitely want to read more of his books. He was pretty prolific too, so I’ve got quite the backlist to choose from. ;)

Exit Wounds by Rutu Modan is an Israeli graphic novel, which I found ‘meh.’ The main character drives a taxicab and gets caught up in a quest to find out if his father died in an explosion when an Israeli girl fresh from her military service shows up one day. I didn’t really connect with any of the characters; they all felt flat to me. And I didn’t get much of a window into Israeli life or culture. For the most part, I liked the artwork, but I would have had no idea that the Israeli girl was a girl if the words hadn’t said so. I think that was intentional, though. Anyway, it seems like this one has garnered lots of accolades, so you still might want to check it out despite my reaction.

Raise the Lantern by Su Tong was another November Novella Challenge choice: it had three novellas in the book. I was nervous about this one, because in the past I’ve never loved fiction written by male Chinese authors. But the title novella, which is also the first one, was wonderful! About a young girl who has to become as a third wife after her family’s ruined, and her adaptations to her new life with its political machinations. I loved everything about it, from the narrative style to the characters to the story. It was dynamic, interesting, wonderful. I eagerly turned to the second novella, “Nineteen Thirty-Four Escapes.” And I hated it. It was like a completely different author writing it-the narrative voice was awful, there was a lot of misogyny and ickiness, and I couldn’t wait for it to be over. So I decided to go ahead and read the third novella, “Opium Family,” to find out which of the first two was the anomaly. Unfortunately, this one was just like “Nineteen Thirty-Four Escapes,” and I hated it as well. So I won’t be reading more of Su Tong in the future, but I did really love “Raise the Red Lantern.”

Speaking of China, I read The Last Days of Old Beijing by Michael Meyer for the China Challenge. Meyer originally moved to China to teach English for the Peace Corps and he stayed afterwards. He was teaching at an international school in Beijing (in college he studied elementary education) when he heard about the hutong neighbourhoods (the oldest parts of Beijing) being razed in the name of progress. Rather than just complain from the outside, he decided to move into one, volunteering to teach at the local school so that he’s not seen as a foreigner, and writing this book. The book combines Meyer’s own experiences with interviews he does with all kinds of Beijing-ers with brief chapters on the history of Bejing itself. It’s wonderful. Meyer has a great writing style that I loved to go back to, and everything in the book is just fascinating. I had really high expectations of this one when I put in on my challenge list, and all of those expectations were met. I highly recommend this one if you’re at all curious about China or progress or unusual expat memoirs (I wouldn’t call this a memoir per se, but some chapters are).

In my rereading of The Belgariad, I’ve now finished the third book: Magician’s Gambit by David Eddings. It’s impossible for me to be objective about these books; I read them so much when I was younger that they’re total comfort reads. Reading this one, I noticed something about the writing style might not appeal to 2009 Eva-Eddings uses adverbs a lot. But I love the story, and I love the characters, and they’re all old friends. So there. ;) I think the good aspects of the books easily balance out the adverbs, but as I said I’m a very biased reader. I’ll be finishing up the other two in the series before the year is out!

I feel confident recommending Proust and the Squid by Maryanne Wolf to everyone. I read it for the Science Book Challenge, but I’m positive that people who adore reading the way book bloggers do will all love this. Wolf is a neuroscienctist whose emphasis is on how people learn to read. She’s also an avid reader herself, which is so evident in the text, both in the way she talks about reading and in her frequent quotes from a variety of novels. The book has three parts: first there’s a look at how writing first arose and the history of alphabets and that stuff, then Wolf turns to how modern-day children learn to read and what’s going on in their brains, and the last part is about dyslexia and when brains have problems learning to read. I seriously can’t emphasise enough how much I loved this; I’m depressed that I have to return it to the library-I’ll probably buy a copy for myself when I have a job. Every page was a delight. And as a future educator, I found it really helpful; Wolf’s oldest son has dyslexia, and so she comes at that part from a personal perspective as well as a scientific one. I highly, highly recommend this to everyone, but especially to elementary school teachers, parents of children with reading problems, and any pop neuroscience buffs.

The Maias by Eca de Querios was an Orbis Terrarum choice. It’s a Portugese classic, set in the latter half of the nineteenth century, and since I love that era I expected to love this book. Unfortunately, I didn’t. A plot doesn’t even begin to emerge until around page 300 (the book itself is just over 600 pages), and when it does it’s so sensationalistic I found it odd in such a naturalistic novel. Most of the book is just about Carlos, a rich young Portugese nobleman, and how he spends his time seducing married women, spending money, joking about with friends, etc. Now, I don’t need a plot to be a happy reader. But if I don’t have a plot, I have to enjoy the main character. And frankly, I didn’t care about Carlos…throughout most of the book, I just kept thinking to myself “Why? Why do I care? When is something going to happen?” I hate that, because I expected to be all gush-y about how wonderful forgotten classics are and telling you to go out and read this. But this one just wasn’t for me. The writing itself was good; I’m definitely willing to give Querios a second chance (with a shorter book). But I was quite happy when I reached the final page.

Finally, I read a standalone book from the Sandman series: The Dream Hunters by Neil Gaiman and Yoshitaka Amano. Nymeth told me I’d love this, and she was totally right! :) It’s not a traditional graphic novel: it’s more like a picture book for adults in that the text and illustrations are seperate. The illustrations are all these beautiful water colours, and the story is a retelling of a Japanese fairy tale about a fox falling in love with a monk. I think Gaiman is wonderful when he’s writing in a fairy tale style, so I loved the words. And the pictures was so, so beautiful and added a lot to the story. And the story itself was marvelous. In case you can’t tell, I highly recommend this one! I think it would be great for readers new to the graphic format, since it’s halfway in between. And at novella length, it doesn’t require a huge time commitment, although if you’re like me you’ll get lost in the artwork. This is seriously nothing like the Sandman graphic novels, except that Morpheus appears towards the end; it was achingly beautiful and a book I definitely want to own.

There you have it-many of the books that I’ve been reading lately. Sorry that I haven’t been commenting on blogs the way that I usually do or replying to the comments y’all have left me; it’s been a rough week.

[Via http://astripedarmchair.wordpress.com]

Friday, November 27, 2009

Michelle Obama State Dinner Dress

Michelle Style, a strapless gown by Indian-American designer Naeem Khan.   Chandelier earrings and glittering gold and diamond bangles. This was for the White House State Dinner with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and his wife Mrs. Gursharan Kaur. What do you think about Michelle Dress?

Click On Links:

Michelle Obama Chimp Image On Google

Michelle Obama Hula Hoop

Big Bird And Michelle Obama On Sesame Street

Michelle Obama Called Ghetto Girl

Michelle Obamas Weight Problem

Michelle Obamas Pot Belly

Mayara Tavares

Michelle Obama Ruffle Collar Blouse

Obama, Looking at woman in Italy

Michelle Obama’s Arms

Michelle Obama’s Short-Shorts

Michelle Obama’s New Hair Style

Michelle Obama Wax figure

Michelle Obama’s Fashion

Michelle Obama Touches Queen Elizabeth

Michelle Obama On The Cover Of Glamour Magazine

Share

[Via http://emptysuit.wordpress.com]

Everyone knows this

A couple of weeks ago, while I was minding my own business online, our broadband access went out. For expats, the internet is akin to a vital  biological function, like breathing. When it disappears inexplicably it is never good.

After much poking at wires and turning off and on of the router, (pretty much the sum total of my technical expertise right there) Mr B, who arrived home in blissful ignorance of this unfolding domestic drama, promptly copped the flak.

It turns out our landline bill has not been paid.

Since we moved in.

In June.

Apparently, even though we’ve never used it and even though ADSL service is part of our rent, a monthly fee has to be paid for a landline in order to keep the ADSL on. After a mercifully short excursion to China Unicom where one employee spoke enough English to help me fill out the myriad forms in Chinese characters, we were told to wait a week and then service would be resumed.

My problem with this is not that we were cut off. That’s normal for non payment of bills. What is totally baffling is that we have not received a single bill, reminder notice, or in fact ANY kind of communication from China Unicom telling us this was coming.

When I mentioned this little episode to one of the very helpful employees in our building, she looked at me as if I came from another planet. Which in many ways I do.

Her response was, “but everybody knows that around 20th of the month bills must be paid!”

“Even though there is no bill sent? No reminders? And there is no mention of this in any of our contracts?”

“Yes, of course. This is China. Everybody knows this is how it works here,” she confirmed.

Everybody except a remedial wife it seems.

[Via http://wifeschool.wordpress.com]

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Chinese art

It is amazing that Chinese art has become the most expensive  worldwide. When we visited  China in the early 90s, we bought three Chinese paintings in Beijing. One was an original color sketch of a branch with flowers, and two were immense reproductions of Chinese calligraphy found in caves. We paid peanuts for all three. Today Chinese painting is selling in the millions. Yesterday in the NYT (11/24/09), there was a picture of a Chinese artist posing in jeans before his painting of laughing men in jeans. His paintings, and others, are selling for millions of dollars.

[Via http://agebuster.wordpress.com]

Another day, another Chinese mine disaster.

Bless me father for I have sinned, but please don’t let me come back as a Chinese miner. Yes there has been yet another mining related accident in China, this time in a mine near the city of Hegang in NorthEastern China. A gas blast has claimed the lives of 107 (so far) people, and the locals are not happy at all about it. It is the worst mining disaster since 123 people were killed in a mine in Southern Guangdong province when it flooded.

Thousands of people are reportedly killed each year in Chinese mines – and that’s only those lucky enough to be reported – it is possible the number of unreported deaths is expotentially larger again. While China continues to go through periods of massive resource-hungry growth, the emphasis put on obtaining those resources is heavy. If China is ever going to take its place in the world as a first world country power – if it ever wants to get up there on a level such as the United States, then things such as this simply must be brought to an end.

[Via http://lifeafterchina.wordpress.com]

Monday, November 23, 2009

Zhang Ziyi y Shu Qi desnudas.

Sí, el titular es llamativo. Puede parecer un truco sucio para llamar vuestra atención, pero no es nuestro.

Zhang Ziyi ha anunciado que quiere a Shu Qi para la película “Secret Fan“, basada en una novela del mismo título de la escritora Lisa Lee. ¿Y qué tiene que ver esto con los desnudos? Pues parece ser que la novela tiene más de una escena en que las dos protagonistas aparecen completamente desnudas, escribiendo una en el cuerpo de la otra.

Shu Qi empezó su carrera en películas de categoría III, y fotografías eróticas (no os las vamos a poner aquí ¡pervertidos!…para eso está Google), así que parece que no le hace mucha gracia la idea. Ziyi está intentando convencerla a toda costa, pero por si acaso no lo consigue, hay una lista de posibles sustitutas: Fan Bingbing, Ruby Lin, Yao Chen, Zhou Xun (¡¡¡voto por Zhou Xun!!!), Gong Li (Gong Li desnuda, seguro que la mitad de búsquedas de Google en la historia, contienen esas palabras…), Maggie Cheung y Li Bingbing.

La verdad es que la lista parece que la hayamos hecho nosotros al responder a “¿A quien te gustaría ver retozando con Zhang Ziyi?“, pero no es nuestra, lo juramos.

A todo esto, la película trata de dos amigas (en chino “laotong” amigas unidas, como en un juramento de hermanas), que viven los tortuentos finales del siglo XIX (Crisis política y social en China, la última dinastía estaba a punto de caer). Lily y Snowflower (así se llaman las chicas) han pasado la vida recluídas en casa, y ambas han sufrido el vendamiento de pies, y su relación se va haciendo más fuerte poco a poco hasta que llegan a lo de escribirse cosas en el cuerpo (al parecer, una tradición poética de Hunan).

En fin, Zhang Ziyi es la que ha dado la lista, suponemos que para crear todo este “hype” respecto a lo de los desnudos. Lo que no sabemos si esta vez, Ziyi se desnudará o utilizará una doble de cuerpo como ha hecho siempre hasta ahora.

[Via http://dimsumcinema.wordpress.com]

TCv3 on Lech Lecha and the Month of Kislev

A lighted Hanukkah

Oops, guess I have to delay my Torah Study for the FFOZ Torah Club Volume 3 study material for a week or 2 as I have missed one whole week of Parashah Vayera reading during my recent trip to Beijing, China. No matter what it is I still need to study all the weekly study material provided for by the TCV3 course and to share it here whenever I have captured a few important keypoints from my study. Right now I am studying the material for Parashah Vayera from the TCV3 study material and it’s a quite joy to read but let me provide the summary of what I have learnt from the previous Parashah which is Lech Lecha. I got sick a couple of days since my return to Singapore as the weather in Beijing was extremely unpredictable and frenzily cold at times. My wife too got a flu and fever back here and taken 2 days mc and so did I. So all in all, I lost quite a number of days of not been able to study God’s Word, The Torah.

OK, about the study of Lech Lecha. What does it tell us and how can we apply this study in our daily life? From the study, it talks about the Exile of Israel and also the Redemption of Israel through God’s anointed one, Cyrus, the Persian king. Remember we are now studying the Haftarah portion of each of this weekly parashah and so usually we will not discuss stuff concerning the Torah portion. The Haftarah portion on Parashah Lech Lecha is to read Isaiah 40:27 – 41:16 and this specific passage is about God reassuring the Jewish people that even though they are been exiled to a foreign land and under harsh oppression, they are still the Mighty God’s chosen ones. God will not abandon them not to mention forsaking them and God would do it so miraculously marvelous that He make a Persian king to show favour to them and send them home to Israel and help build their Temple for them and let them study their beloved Torah again. What God had done let no man questions. What God had blessed let no man curses.

Actually the reading of the Haftarah Lech Lecha on Isaiah’s passage contains 3 supposed references that link to the story of Abraham’s journey to the Promised Land. Isaiah 41:8 been one as a correlation to the Torah portion because God consider Abraham His friend. The following passage continues with idol-makers at work in a workshop is also another one as an allusion to the story of Abraham. According to the rabbinic legend, Abraham’s father was an idol-maker and as a child, he worked in his father’s shop. A 3rd connection would be the description of God calling up a hero from the east to save His people.

Rabbinic interpretation would consider this hero Abraham himself but many scholars however have understood it that this hero were refering to Cyrus, the Persian king and not Abraham. So if God would save His people from the harsh oppression of the Babylonians through Cyrus His anointed, certainly God would again save His people from the evil oppression of the nations through our beloved Messiah Yeshua His Final Anointed. So all brothers and sisters in Messiah, pray for the peace of Jerusalem and pray for the Jewish people.

By the way, this month is the month of Kislev, the month where we celebrate Hanukkah – the Feast of Dedication. A Feast where our beloved Master Yeshua celebrates together with his disciple during his life-time ministry on earth. (John 10:22-30) Though this has been a time-honored celebration by the Jewish people, the earliest attestation to the celebration of Hanukkah is not from Josephus or the Mishnah, but from the Gospel of John. Relating to the story of Hanukkah, the Master points out that he had already told them, “the works that I do in my Father’s name, these testify of me” (10:25). For both the Maccabees and the Master, the presence of God’s miracles signified his approval of their efforts. Both sought to uphold the true standard of Torah in the face of opposition. For the Maccabees, Hellenist Jews and Syrian-Greek persecutors opposed them. For the Master, unbelieving Pharisees and Sadducees challenged his teaching of Torah and the Kingdom of God. The above bold sentences are from the interpretative works of the FFOZ eRosh team.

Now, let me continue with my study on Vayera and see what I learn from them. Pardon me as this is actually the Parashah week on Toldot. Sorry about the insequentiallito…..

Baruch HaShem, baruch Yeshua.

[Via http://haamein.wordpress.com]

Friday, November 20, 2009

Background on Damon De La Pena

As part of his business development role, Damon is always seeking new supply chain management projects to drive cost saving strategies for existing and new BDM clients.  He has built a successful supply chain consulting firm with his business partner and the BDM team.  Damon has utilized a combined twenty-six years of Intel and BDM supply chain management experience and applied it directly to client solutions. Through the experience, he has sharpened core leadership, business development, management and strategic planning skills as a CEO to grow the company. He thrives on innovation and pushes his strategic thinking, auditing, marketing, organizational development and management skills daily to provide clients with cost saving results and best in class consulting services.  Recently, the BDM team provided solutions for their utility, oil & gas, manufacturing, and technology clients to lean their supply chain strategies and reduce costs. BDM has directly saved large utility clients over:

  • $0.5M with a vendor managed inventory solution
  • $1.7M through a commodity source strategy
  • $2.0M with a surplus/obsolete inventory solution

In his Director role, he has set clear vision and built strategic alliances with key business and technology partners. These alliances have resulted in new product offerings and international business opportunities in Scotland, China, Romania and across the US.  Damon recently joined the Greater Phoenix Economic Business Council (GPEC) and is actively participating in renewable energy business development strategies.  He is also a member of the GPEC International Leadership team.

Damon earned an MBA with an international business focus from Arizona State University. In addition to his current role, he cultivated this focus with practical experience from two Intel international expatriate assignments and integrates this experience into optimizing his client’s business operations. He spent the last 10 years developing his global management skills as an expat in South East Asia. In this capacity he negotiated global contracts and managed inventory procurement for one of Intel’s start up factories. While on assignment, he took on a role as a Risk and Controls Manager mitigating excessive cost risk, business interruption risk, and corporate fraud. A key career highlight of Damon’s was the creation of a new Global Risk Management Organization for Intel’s largest division, the Technology Manufacturing Group. He managed a global team of Risk and Controls Managers in 14 countries. This organization was able to reduced overall risk exposure to Intel Corporation by $300M over a three year period.

Professionally, Damon is driven to help develop leaders’ ability to better utilize a company’s most important asset — it’s people.  Personally, Damon is an adventurous hiker having hiked to Everest Base Camp in Nepal, the Inca Trail in Peru and the Grand Canyon in Arizona. He enjoys scuba diving, fitness training, and international travel. Damon, his wife and 4 children enjoy spending time together at the beach, mountain biking and traveling together.

Learn more about his expertise, projects and career at BDM Consulting Inc..

The Eviction Of Palestinian Families Continue, When they want a home the Israeli's just steal it

China criticizes new Israeli move on settlements
By Ali Waked and AP
November 19 2009
Beijing says plan to expand southeastern Jerusalem neighborhood poses new obstacles to peace process, urges ‘concrete measures to restore Palestine-Israel mutual trust.’ PA officials: Americans now realize Israel deriding US, international law

China criticized the Israeli government’s move to expand a Jewish neighborhood in the part of Jerusalem claimed by Palestinians, saying it poses new obstacles to the Middle East peace process.

The remarks by China’s Foreign Ministry on Thursday added to a chorus of American, European and Palestinian demands that Israel stop settlement activity in the disputed part of the holy city.

“We urge the Israeli side to take concrete measures to restore Palestine-Israel mutual trust and create favorable conditions for the early resumption of talks between them,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang said in a regular briefing.

Israel announced this week it will press forward with construction of 900 apartments in a Jewish neighborhood in east Jerusalem. Israel insists that east Jerusalem is part of Israel and rejects efforts to restrict building there. Palestinians consider the Jewish neighborhoods there as settlements.

Jerusalem and settlements are key sticking points in Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. Israel captured east Jerusalem in the 1967 Mideast war and annexed it, but no other country recognized that move. About 180,000 Israelis live in neighborhoods built around east Jerusalem.

‘Translate this rage into diplomatic pressure’

While Beijing is not traditionally a heavyweight in Middle East diplomacy, China in recent years has become more active, seeing stability in the Middle East as helping to secure the oil and gas imports the Chinese economy relies on.

Meanwhile, Palestinian sources said on Thursday that they have been told by American officials that the moment of truth regarding the settlement issue was nearing.

According to the Palestinians, the Americans said the Obama Administration would consider backing – or at the very least not vetoing – a Palestinian appeal to the UN Security Council regarding the establishment of an independent state without Israel’s consent.

“The Americans made it clear to us that their position has apparently not resonated with the Israelis and that the Israelis misconstrued (Secretary of State Hillary) Clinton’s statement according to which a West Bank settlement construction freeze should not be a precondition (to the resumption of peace negotiations),” one of the Palestinian sources told Ynet.

“The Americans said that while a settlement freeze should not be a prerequisite to jump starting negotiations, they support our claim that settlement construction may lead to the collapse of the entire peace process,” said one of the sources, adding that the Americans vowed to “toughen their stance” towards Israel.

According to the source, in talks with Palestinian Authority officials the Americans said the Israelis heard “some very unpleasant comments” regarding Jewish construction in the West Bank.

“The Americans now understand what the rest of the world realized long ago – that Israel is making a mockery of the US as well as international law,” said the Palestinian.

“It is our hope that this time the Americans will translate this rage into diplomatic pressure,” he said.

Source

By Jacky Rowland

The United Nations, the United States and the European Union have all called on Israel to stop the illegal eviction of Palestinians and the demolition of their homes.

Ban Ki-moon, the UN secretary-general, urged Israel to end its “provocative actions” in East Jerusalem, while calling for it to freeze all settlement activity in the occupied West Bank.

Despite that, the sight of Palestinians in East Jerusalem being forced out of their homes has become an all too familiar scene.

Al Jazeera’s Jacky Rowland reports from occupied East Jerusalem.

Israeli Lobby in the UK and how it influences Law Makers

Dispatches investigates one of the most powerful and influential political lobbies in Britain, which is working in support of the interests of the State of Israel.

Recent Articles

Rabbi’s are just as abusive as those from any other Religion/List of Rabbi’s who are criminals A Palestinian student has been handcuffed, blindfolded and forcibly expelled to the Gaza

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Obama: Incoherent and Incompetent or Architect of American Downfall?

It is difficult to decide which is greater: Obama’s incoherence or his incompetence.

When it has become obvious to all but the brain-dead that the massive spending and swelling debt are a recipe for economic disaster, Barack Obama is now saying that perhaps massive debt may result in a “double-dip recession“.

“I think it is important, though, to recognize if we keep on adding to the debt, even in the midst of this recovery, that at some point, people could lose confidence in the U.S. economy in a way that could actually lead to a double-dip recession.”

Really Barack?  Did you think of that all by yourself or did you need your heros in Socialist China to tell you that your economic policies are failures?

Now Barack Obama says he is considering “tax provisions”, whatever that means, but what is Obama doing?

The ink was literally not even dry on Obama’s first failed Socialist Stimulus and he was already talking about a second one.  Now the Socialist/Democrats are following through on a bill for a second dose of disaster.

Furthermore, Obama’s budget for October 2009, the first month of the Federal Government’s new fiscal year, was a $176B deficit, the largest ever and that was only the first month.  Obama’s spending for his first year was also a record as was the deficit he created at $1.4T.

There are only two possible explanations

  1. Barack Obama is so incompetent and incoherent that he is making every possible mistake there is to be made
  2. Barack Obama is very focussed and has a well planned agenda to destroy the value of the US$, bringing the US economy and most of the world’s economies down with it, driving every nation towards a single global currency and forcing everyone to live under one government and at the same level of poverty.

Given Barack Obama’s statements, those of his wife and their associations with, socialists and anti-American terrorists it is clear that Obama is an extreme socialist and has no intention of seeing Americans have any form of personal freedom or seeing America succeed economically.

Is Obama incoherent and incompetent?  For that to be true one would have to make one assumption: Obama want’s Americans to be free and succeed.  That of course is not the case.  Obama is neither incoherent or  incompetent. 

When Obama tells you that his actions are destroying the US and proceeds to redouble those efforts he could not be more transparent about his real intentions.

Barack Obama poses the single greatest threat to Americans, their freedoms, their future and the success of the US.

worker bees

In addition to the sinister “Everything better red” banners, there are a few other significant differences in office life I’ve noticed since I started working in China.

- Going to lunch at 11.30am.  On the dot.  En masse.
- Taking naps after said lunch.  Fully splayed along couches and kitchen chairs.
- Humidifiers on every desk.  Pink ones.  With cartoons and flowers.
- People using cellphones in the restroom.  The public, 6 stall, noisy flushing restroom.
- Snacks in Germany: candy, pretzels, and more candy.  Snacks in China: sesame peanut cookies, Chinese rice krispy treats, and dried beef chunks.
- Coworker lectures for not dressing warmly enough.

And don’t get me started on the additional differences of working in an office of 100 engineers.  Sometimes I think I’m working for an entirely different company.  But previous comments aside, it’s interesting how the office environment insulates you from the outside world.  With English-only emails and colleagues around the world, it is shockingly easy to spend the entire day working exactly as you would in any other office in the world.  I’m not sure if this speaks to the wonders of a global company, or the depressingly Office Space-esque nature of corporate life.

Monday, November 16, 2009

Goldeneye Morning Paddle - 11/16/2009

***Please note our disclosures and terms of use here. >>>>

Good morning!  A few items of interest on our paddle through the news this morning:

China critic of the U.S. bubble machine.  Bloomberg reports on comments from Liu Mingkang, chairman of the China Banking Regulatory Commission, cautioning against continued interest rate suppression in the U.S., resulting carry trades, and inflated global asset prices.

APEC concedes that upcoming Copenhagen climate talks will accomplish little in the way of a binding accord as differences amongst key countries remain significant.  (Bloomberg)

China’s supply glut.  The Telegraph’s Evans-Pritchard on China’s under-analyzed capacity bubble and the risk it poses to global economies.

The world economy is still skating on thin ice. The West is sated with debt, the East with plant. The crisis has been contained (or masked) by zero rates and a fiscal blast, trashing sovereign balance sheets. But the core problem remains. The Anglo-sphere and Club Med are tightening belts, yet Asia is not adding enough demand to compensate. It is adding supply.

My view is that markets are still in denial about the structural wreckage of the credit bubble. There are two more boils to lance: China’s investment bubble; and Europe’s banking cover-up. I fear that only then can we clear the rubble and, very slowly, start a fresh cycle.

Obama Apoligizes For America Again and Again

President Obama, cannot stop apologizing for America. What is wrong with him. Within hours of arriving in Tokyo, along side Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama, Obama said he would like to visit Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the targets of American atomic bombs in 1945. This is because he questions the judgment of President Harry Truman, who made the decision to drop the bombs. Obama came close to apologising for America, ending the war and actually saving lives.

 

President Obama apologizing to Chinese students

A few hours later when Obama met Emperer Akihito, he bowed deeply. Despite what David Axelrod will tell you, this is NOT what U.S. Presidents do — except President Obama. I wrote about this problem in: Barack Obama: USA Will Grovel and be Obsequious to the Rest of World

 

In Shanghai, Obama held a ‘town hall’ before a stiff as boards college crowd. I counted at least four apologies for the United States.

  • When he referred to child labor abuses in Asia, he indicated that this occurred in America too.
  • Then went on to apologise for how women are treated in the United States.
  • Obama talked about the use of bombs — an obtuse reference to the ‘mistake’ of the nuclear bombs dropped in Japan.
  • Obama also apologized for the United States Military!

What do you expect from a man who was mentored by Frank Marshall Davis who was a card-carrying member of the Communist Party USA and by twenty years of hate speech by Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Of course Barack Obama hates the United States and the military.

Congratulations, this is who you elected!

Posted: 2220PT
autone.wordpress.com

Friday, November 13, 2009

MM Lee cautions US against anti-free trade stance

Lee Kuan Yew at the APEC CEO Summit.   The respected, the insightful, the quick-witted and the candid at CNA:

Mr Lee was addressing delegates at the APEC CEO Summit in Singapore on Friday evening. The dialogue lasted just under an hour and touched on wide-ranging issues.

Businessmen, academics and government officials gathered at the dialogue to tap the brains of a respected statesman, and Minister Mentor Lee did not disappoint with his candid answers.

Asked if the US was a declining power in Asia, Mr Lee noted the contest today is an economic one.

He said that if the US Congress does not realise it has to get out of its protectionist mode, then America will have huge problems ahead, especially with an emerging China which has strategically forged several Free Trade Agreements with Asian economies including India and Singapore.

“In the 21st century, the big countries will cancel each other out with their nuclear weapons, so they will not fight militarily. I see the Chinese understanding that, and seeing the strength in their high-quality manpower four times the size of America, they are hungry, they are willing to change their lives.

“If it goes on like that, after eight years – assuming that President Obama goes for a second term – anti-free trade, you are out of the economic race. And if you are out of the economic race, you will lose in the long run… If they don’t get the economy going, there will be a shift in Congress and maybe some in the Senate in the mid-term elections and then the penny will drop,” said Mr Lee. …

To illustrate China’s strengths, Mr Lee gave a personal insight into his meeting with former leader Deng Xiaoping.

He said: “When I first met Deng Xiaoping in 1978 in Singapore, he said, ‘I congratulate you’. I said, ‘What for?’ He said, ‘You have made this a garden city and everybody owns their own homes’. And I said, ‘Well, it’s a small place. Whatever we can do, you can do better. We are the descendants of the lenders, peasants of South China. You have the literati, you have the top brains, you have the poise, the artists’. He did not answer me, he just looked at me and went back to his food.”

It was a dialogue peppered with many personal insights from Minister Mentor Lee who delighted the audience with his quick wit and candour.

One case in point – when he was asked to comment on a magazine article which outlined five things the US can learn from China, Mr Lee said: “I haven’t read it yet. I saw it on my desk, you tell me what are the five things you have in mind and I will tell you whether I agree with them.”

 

Pneumonic Plague Hits China Now

Plague Hits China Thousand Quarantined

The Pneumonic Plague is spreading in Northwestern China. One man has already died, 11 have been infected and thousands of others are in quarantine.

A 32 year old farmer in Ziketan, a Tibetan area of Qinghai province, has died from the pneumonic plague. The other 11 people are relatives of the dead farmer and are in stable condition in hospital. Over 10,000 others who live in the Ziketan area, which covers about 1,000 square miles, have been quarantined and a team of medical experts have been dispatched to the area.

Pneumonic plague is highly lethal and doea respond to antibiotics in most cases. It is an airborn bacteria that is spread through coughing and sneezing. It is similar to bubonic plague which killed 25 million people in Europe in the Middle Ages.

2 deaths in September 2008, a married couple, have been attributed to the pneumonic plague according to the Chinese health ministry.

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

China on $2 a day

Editor’s Note: This article continues our series excerpted from AC360°’s contributor David Gewirtz’s upcoming book, How To Save Jobs, which will be available in December. Over the next few months, we’ll be excerpting the first section of the book, which answers the question, “How did we get here?”. Last time, we looked at our changing relationship with work This time, we’ll begin our look at how changes China and India will be impacting our workforce for years to come. To learn more about the book, follow David on Twitter @DavidGewirtz.

David Gewirtz | BIO
AC360° Contributor
Editor-in-Chief, ZATZ Publishing

Here’s an interesting universal truth: everyone wants a better life. This is as true of the desperate poor in third world nations as it is of middle-class Americans. And while economic downturns are scary to most Americans, even the poorest of Americans live a better life than the shocking level of never-ending squalor experienced by some of the poorest of the poor in developing nations.

Almost five times as many Chinese and Indian citizens live on less than $2 a day than there are people in the United States.

Nations like the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of India have vowed to change all that. Together, China and India make up 37 percent of the world’s population. By contrast, the United States has only 4 percent of the world’s 6.77 billion people and yet our Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is almost double that of China and four times that of India.

That means that if you want to understand the current job situation in America, you absolutely, positively have to understand the job situation in China and India.

China’s economic overhaul

Both China and India began their long march to first-world status decades ago. Until about 1978, the PRC’s economy was barely a blip on the world’s radar.

When measured in terms of purchasing power, the economy of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is now the second largest in the world, with a $7.8 trillion GDP in 2008. The European Union’s economy is technically larger, but that’s for a cluster of countries.

China’s economic reforms were gradual, often in response to specific problems or economic circumstances.

Since its inception in 1949, China ran a Soviet-style economy. Consumer spending was virtually non-existent, central planning determined nearly all economic activity, and the nation’s industrial growth consisted mainly of building big factories. Entrepreneurship was not only not encouraged, it was actively punished.

Chinese laborers work at a construction site in Hefei, Anhui province.

From 1949 through the 1970s, China tried all sorts of economic gimmicks. The Great Leap Forward turned out to be a great leap into failure. The country’s leaders attempted to move its farmers into communes and force the formation of small-scale factories and agriculture. The country’s peasants weren’t prepared for this, and agricultural productivity plummeted.

Small-scale factories produced output of scarily bad quality that was incredibly expensive to produce. During this time, the Soviets and the Communist Chinese found they couldn’t play well with each other, and even though they shared similar economic philosophies, relations soured. China lost its Soviet advisers, and production quality dropped even more.

By the late 1960s, the situation had gone from bad to worse. Chairman Mao resigned. Liu Shaoqi became the second President of the PRC and headed up the country until 1968.

Liu Shaoqi instituted a series of changes, first among them letting farmers have private plots of land to tend. Communes got smaller and teams managing production were given greater independence. All this helped China’s economy.

But then, in 1966, Mao decided he wanted to retake power and began the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution. Although the Cultural Revolution didn’t have a specific economic plan, it generated enough confusion and unrest to cause the country major economic damage as millions of people stopped working.

The Cultural Revolution left lasting damage to worker productivity. Salaries were frozen, bonuses eliminated, factories employed too many workers simply to counter the extreme unemployment, and workers were hired on a permanent basis, with no regard for performance or quality. For almost 14 years, China’s workers simply phoned it in and while the country’s GDP grew, it didn’t grow by much.

In 1978, Chairman of the Chinese Communist Party Deng Xiaoping initiated a series of economic reforms with the support of Chinese economic pragmatists. They reasoned that previous reforms like the Great Leap Forward hadn’t really worked and didn’t generate enough of an output surplus.

China’s economic reforms were gradual, often in response to specific problems or economic circumstances. In some cases, like the closing of state-run enterprises, the government didn’t really want to carry out the policy change, but found that economic necessity forced the change.

Initially, China began to allow farmers to keep their surpluses, which effectively incentivized them to be more productive. The Chinese government then began to allow international trade and direct foreign investment. These basic reforms increased the overall standard of living for many Chinese, which provided encouragement and motivation for later reforms.

As China entered the 1980s, the government worked to transform production from an industrial base driven primarily by dictates from a central management committee into an industrial base driven much more by market forces.

A key to this was a dual-track price structure, where some goods were offered at state-specified prices, while other goods were allowed to price-fluctuate based on demand. Over time, the ratio of price-controlled to market-driven pricing dropped, and by the 1990s, the pricing of nearly all goods was driven by market demand.

By the end of the 1980s, the Chinese system was a strange mix of near-capitalism and old, Soviet-style central planning. But there was a lot less poverty and China was beginning to enter the world economic stage.

China began to encounter a new problem, one which is still suffers today: wealth disparity. Some Chinese had solidly entered and embraced the middle class, while many others remained dirt poor.

Despite the problem of wealth disparity, by the 1990s, it was clear China was onto something. Growth was increasing, foreign investment in industry had increased markedly, and inflation soared, but then later dropped as interest rates went up. And, in 2003, one of the biggest changes was made in the Communist Party’s Third Plenum (a legislative assembly of sorts). In 2003, protection was enacted for private property rights.

Change was working. China has seen an astounding level of GDP growth, averaging around 10 percent per year.

Living on $2 a day

In 1981, 53 percent of Chinese were subsisting at the poverty level. By 2001, only 8 percent of Chinese citizens were considered at the poverty level. Of course, what China considers middle class is a lot different than what we here in America do. Although the poverty rate dropped from 53 percent to 8 percent, it’s not like 92 percent of Chinese now have homes and cars.

Many Chinese who are no longer considered “in poverty” still live in huts with dirt floors. But now they have enough food to survive. To the Chinese, anyone making more than the equivalent of $2 a day is middle class. That’s $730 a year, or about what most of us Americans spend on cable TV each year.

In the next article, we’ll look at India, and then we’ll start to explore why the economies of these two nations are so tightly linked to our own future and the future of American jobs.

Editor’s Note: This article continues our series excerpting AC360 contributor David Gewirtz’s upcoming book, How To Save Jobs, which will be available in December. Over the next few months, we’ll be excerpting the first section of the book, which answers the question, “How did we get here?”. Last time, we looked at our changing relationship with work This time, we’ll begin our look at how changes China and India will be impacting our workforce for years to come. To learn more about the book, you should follow David on Twitter @DavidGewirtz.

Here’s an interesting universal truth: everyone wants a better life. This is as true of the desperate poor in third world nations as it is of middle-class Americans. And while economic downturns are scary to most Americans, even the poorest of Americans live a better life than the shocking level of never-ending squalor experienced by some of the poorest of the poor in developing nations.

Almost five times as many Chinese and Indian citizens live on less than $2 a day than there are people in the United States.

Nations like the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of India have vowed to change all that. Together, China and India make up 37% of the world’s population. By contrast, the United States has only 4% of the world’s 6.77 billion people and yet our Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is almost double that of China and four times that of India.

That means that if you want to understand the current job situation in America, you absolutely, positively have to understand the job situation in China and India.

China’s economic overhaul

Both China and India began their long march to first-world status decades ago. Until about 1978, the PRC’s economy was barely a blip on the world’s radar.

When measured in terms of purchasing power, the economy of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is now the second largest in the world, with a $7.8 trillion GDP in 2008. The European Union’s economy is technically larger, but that’s for a cluster of countries.

China’s economic reforms were gradual, often in response to specific problems or economic circumstances.

Since its inception in 1949, China ran a Soviet-style economy. Consumer spending was virtually non-existent, central planning determined nearly all economic activity, and the nation’s industrial growth consisted mainly of building big factories. Entrepreneurship was not only not encouraged, it was actively punished.

From 1949 through the 1970s, China tried all sorts of economic gimmicks. The Great Leap Forward turned out to be a great leap into failure. The country attempted to move its farmers into communes and force the formation of small-scale factories and agriculture. The country’s peasants weren’t prepared for this, and agricultural productivity plummeted.

Small-scale factories produced output of scarily bad quality that was incredibly expensive to produce. During this time, the Soviets and the Communist Chinese found they couldn’t play well with each other, and even though they shared similar economic philosophies, relations soured. China lost its Soviet advisors, and production quality dropped even more.

By the late 1960s, the situation had gone from bad to worse. Chairman Mao resigned. Liu Shaoqi became the second President of the PRC and headed up the country until 1968.

Liu Shaoqi instituted a series of changes, first among them letting farmers have private plots of land to tend. Communes got smaller and teams managing production were given greater independence. All this helped China’s economy.

But then, in 1966, Mao decided he wanted to retake power and began the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution. Although the Cultural Revolution didn’t have a specific economic plan, it generated enough confusion and unrest to cause the country major economic damage as millions of people stopped working.

The Cultural Revolution left lasting damage to worker productivity. Salaries were frozen, bonuses eliminated, factories employed too many workers simply to counter the extreme unemployment, and workers were hired on a permanent basis, with no regard for performance or quality. For almost 14 years, China’s workers simply phoned it in and while the country’s GDP grew, it didn’t grow by much.

In 1978, Chairman of the Chinese Communist Party Deng Xiaoping initiated a series of economic reforms with the support of Chinese economic pragmatists. They reasoned that previous reforms like the Great Leap Forward hadn’t really worked and didn’t generate enough of an output surplus.

China’s economic reforms were gradual, often in response to specific problems or economic circumstances. In some cases, like the closing of state-run enterprises, the government didn’t really want to carry out the policy change, but found that economic necessity forced the change.

Initially, China began to allow farmers to keep their surplus, which effectively incentivized them to be more productive. The Chinese government then began to allow international trade and direct foreign investment. These basic reforms increased the overall standard of living for many Chinese, which provided encouragement and motivation for later reforms.

As China entered the 1980s, the government worked to transform production from an industrial base driven primarily by dictates from a central management committee into an industrial base driven much more by market forces.

A key to this was a dual-track price structure, where some goods were offered at state-specified prices, while other goods were allowed to price-fluctuate based on demand. Over time, the ratio of price-controlled to market-driven pricing dropped, and by the 1990s, the pricing of nearly all goods was driven by market demand.

By the end of the 1980s, the Chinese system was a strange mix of near-capitalism and old, Soviet-style central planning. But there was a lot less poverty and China was beginning to enter the world economic stage.

China began to encounter a new problem, one which is still suffers today: wealth disparity. Some Chinese had solidly entered and embraced the middle class, while many others remained dirt poor.

Despite the problem of wealth disparity, by the 1990s, it was clear China was onto something. Growth was increasing, foreign investment in industry had increased markedly, and inflation soared, but then later dropped as interest rates went up. And, in 2003, one of the biggest change was made in the Communist Party’s Third Plenum (a legislative assembly of sorts). In 2003, protection was enacted for private property rights.

Change was working. China has seen an astounding level of GDP growth, averaging about 10% per year.

Living on $2 a day

In 1981, 53% of Chinese were subsisting at the poverty level. By 2001, only 8% of Chinese citizens were considered at the poverty level. Of course, what China considers middle class is a lot different than what we here in America do. Although the poverty rate dropped from 53% to 8%, it’s not like 92% of Chinese now have homes and cars.

Many Chinese who are no longer considered “in poverty” still live in huts with dirt floors. But now they have enough food to survive. To the Chinese, anyone making more than the equivalent of $2 a day is middle class. That’s $730 a year, or about what most of us Americans spend on cable TV each year.

In the next article, we’ll look at India, and then we’ll start to explore why the economy of these two nations is so tightly linked to our own future and the future of American jobs.

Follow David on Twitter at http://www.Twitter.com/DavidGewirtz.

Follow David on Twitter at http://www.Twitter.com/DavidGewirtz.

Editor’s note: David Gewirtz is Editor-in-Chief, ZATZ Magazines, including OutlookPower Magazine. He is a leading Presidential scholar specializing in White House email. He is a member of FBI InfraGard, the Cyberterrorism Advisor for the International Association for Counterterrorism & Security Professionals, a columnist for The Journal of Counterterrorism and Homeland Security, and has been a guest commentator for the Nieman Watchdog of the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University. He is a faculty member at the University of California, Berkeley extension, a recipient of the Sigma Xi Research Award in Engineering and was a candidate for the 2008 Pulitzer Prize in Letters.

Sights, Smells and Sounds

What a whirlwind trip we are having! I can’t believe it’s Wednesday already, with only 2 full days of travel left! We haven’t seen the Great Wall yet, but we’ve seen the “Great Firewall!” Yes, many webpages, blogs, Facebook and YouTube are blocked in China. I guess the government doesn’t like the content, so they have somehow blocked all people from accessing these pages anywhere in China (we, of course, have a way around it). Don’t tell anyone, k?

So, we couldn’t go to the Great Wall the other day because the highway we wanted to take to get to that section of the Wall was closed, due to limited visibility due to “fog.” This is what people call the smog, because it makes them feel better. But, it didn’t seem like the air was moist, like it is with fog, but with a healthy temperature inversion, the pollution was staying close to the ground and bringing the visibility down. I would say the visibility was about a mile for a couple of days, maybe a little less (and have I mentioned I have training in weather observation?). So, we went to a tailor on Saturday instead, and ordered some clothing to be made — I am very excited! I am having a Chinese dress made, and a shirt, and Darren is getting a shirt and a “zoot suit.” Zoot suits are what serious swing-dancers wear — it is going to be great! Yesterday we went for our first fitting of the clothing, and saw some beautiful dress coats made of wool and cashmere, so we decided to order coats as well! Somewhere, there is a small group of ladies sewing madly for us, so we can pick it all up on Friday. I have to go back tomorrow for a second fitting, but Darren should be good to go. What an opportunity for us to have hand-made tailored clothes, really great quality, made by a friend of a friend!

What else have we done? We went to the Ancient Observatory, which was neat. It was a collection of metal instruments on top of a huge stone structure, which was actually a part of the original city wall, and some stone and metal sundials on the ground, in a little park. There were some indoor displays, which we enjoyed thoroughly due to them being inside heated buildings! It was a cold day, and we were starting to be pretty chilled. It’s been quite cool here (-6 C to +17 C on the hottest day) and if I don’t wear my long johns, it’s pretty chilly — especially now, since the inversion is gone, it’s clear and cool (but the cleaner air is worth it).

Beijing is a funny place, in many ways! Some areas are completely modern, western, and familiar: Starbucks, McDonald’s, KFC, shopping centres with all the typical stores (although I don’t necessarily recognize the chains, as many are European), shiny glass buildings, skyscrapers, subways, cars, buses, etc. I saw a double-decker transit bus yesterday — pretty crazy! I’ve been squeezed into subway cars, when I thought it was full and then 6 more people got on! It’s crowded a lot in places like subways and busy streets with shopping nearby, but I’ve also walked down quiet back streets with very few people. There are taxis everywhere! I don’t think we’ve ever waited more than 5 minutes to catch one. The taxi drivers are not very talkative, but some say “bye bye” when we get out. Darren can speak a bit of Chinese, enough to hold a simple conversation, give the taxi driver directions, or talk to the seamstress or whatever. The traffic here is nuts (it reminds me of Montreal, only worse!) and the taxi drivers are right in there making it worse! Gads. Lanes are a suggestion, and for some drivers, speed limits a dare. Pedestrians are everywhere, crossing against the light all the time, standing between lanes, dodging cars, leaping in front or behind, it’s madness! One time, we went through a tunnel of people, standing 3 or 4 deep along both sides of the curved lane we were turning left in, leaning in to see when the traffic would end and they could continue across. It’s tricky to stay together, yet it’s dangerous to hold hands in case one person needs to leap out of the way!

I promised to tell you about the toilets. Sheesh! Most are not “sit-down” toilets like we are used to. They are squatting toilets, which means a shallow ceramic bowl set into the floor, which you put one foot on each side of and then squat down and do what you have to do. I don’t like them. I can do it if I can’t find a sitting toilet, but I don’t like it. The bathrooms are pretty smelly too, especially the men’s (which I can smell when I walk by) — I guess they can’t aim very well! (They have ordinary urinals as well as the squatting toilets.) The only good thing is that no skin touches anything.

That’s all for now… Sorry for the picture-less blogs, I’ll do some photo blogs once I get home. I’ll write more later, when I have time!

Monday, November 9, 2009

No More Pajama Party?

One of the more eye-catching fixtures of urban life in China is the habit some folks have of going out and about in their pajamas.  In the more traditional neighborhoods, local residents will think nothing of running a few errands or chatting with friends on a busy corner — women in patterned cotton jammies with slippers on their feet, men stripped down to their t-shirts and boxers.  I’ve even run into a few at the grocery store, looking like they just awoke from a rather ambitious stretch of sleepwalking.  Where we live in Beijing, the patients at the nearby hospital often enjoy fresh-air strolls in the summer evenings, clad in nothing but their bedclothes – yet the sight here is so common it attracts little or no attention.

If the Shanghai government gets its way, though, all that is about to change.  The city is notoriously fussy about its global image.  The movie Mission Impossible 3 was banned in China for its scenes depicting Tom Cruise racing around streets lined with laundry drying from the windows, which Shanghai officials felt reflected badly on the city — never mind that’s what Shanghai streets actually look like.  Now officials are concerned that, with the World Expo arriving in 2010, foreign visitors might find the city’s pajama-clad locals a cause for derision.

So, according to an article at ChinaHush.com, the Shanghai government is mounting a vigorous campaign to stop people from wearing pajamas in public:

Shen is the “Alley President” of Shanghai Pudong New Area Changlidong road Qiba residential community. At this stage, his work is divided into two parts, one is managing residential district daily affairs, and the second is “Welcoming the World Expo”. The activity of “Not going outside wearing pajamas, become a World Expo civilized person” is one of the elements in the second part.

Qiba residential district’s “civilized dress persuasion team” has activities twice a week, each is one to two hours. Shen Guofang said that the persuasion team has 10 volunteers, each wearing a red silk belt. They are dressed neatly and stand at the entrance of the residential community. When they see residents going outside wearing pajamas, volunteers approach the residents and dissuade them from going out like that.

“In just over an hour, hundreds of residents already accepted our persuasion, this event was very effective” Qiba’s website recorded the “achievement” of the first day of the activity.

The activity has been carried out for more than two months now, “with good results, the number of people wearing pajamas outside has obviously been reduced.” Shen was satisfied.

The entire article is well worth reading.  In addition to providing plenty of amusing anecdotes, it sheds interesting light on cultural attitudes in China, where wearing pajamas in public has a long association with wealth and leisure, and where choice of dress is an expression of newfound personal freedom.  Shanghai residents are apparently strongly split over the practice, with 42% describing it as “low class” or “uncivil” and 58% considering it “convenient” or “normal.”  At least some of the pro-pajama majority are quite adamant in their resentment of the new policy, which they see as a violation of their civil rights and caving in to foreign attitudes.

If they’re lucky however, the Shanghai government will eventually lose interest and move on to other crusades.  As Shen, the “Alley President” explains, pajamas are no longer his focus of attention: “This is not the main task at hand anymore, every 100 days there is a new initiative, we are following the plan, now we are at the stage of stopping people from running the red light.”  Good luck with that.

Why MM's comment on US-China 'balancing act' needs to taken in right context

Isn’t China ‘our’ friend? ‘Our’ economic miracle? ‘Our’ photo opportunity to band together as comrades to show US and the West the proverbial Chink middle finger?

Then why did MM Lee, in a move guaranteed to help every Chinese flame forum achieve nuclear critical mass, make the following statement during the US-Asean Business Council’s 25th anniversary dinner in Washington on Oct 27:

‘The size of China makes it impossible for the rest of Asia, including Japan and India, to match it in weight and capacity in about 20 to 30 years. So we need America to strike a balance.‘

Reading this, Singaporeans must be suffering from some serious cognitive dissonance: on the one hand, we’re constantly told that we have to hitch the economic future of our children to the Chinese bandwagon or face imminent starvation, and then on the other, to hear implicit claims from our leaders that China is not a trustworthy partner for the long term, requiring ‘geopolitical balancing’ from the US, since the Nips and Indians don’t have what it takes to keep China in line.

Local detractors – as always – will say that MM Lee skipped a daily prescription of dopamine. But I would argue that the MM is reading from a wider canvas: this smart old codger is one of the few who understand why US behaves the way it does, and I think he got it spot on with this one.

To understand why MM Lee is (sigh) right, here’s some required reading from STRATFOR:

Strategy, as we have argued, is less a matter of choice than a matter of reality imposing itself on presidents. Former U.S. President George W. Bush, for example, rarely had a chance to make strategy. He was caught in a whirlwind after only nine months in office and spent the rest of his presidency responding to events, making choices from a menu of very bad options. Similarly, Obama came into office with a preset menu of limited choices. He seems to be fighting to create new choices, not liking what is on the menu. He may succeed. But it is important to understand the overwhelming forces that shape his choices and to understand the degree to which whatever he chooses is embedded in U.S. grand strategy, a strategy imposed by geopolitical reality.

The article goes on to argue that America’s grand strategy is essentially modeled after the British Empire, writ large at a global scale. The English strategy was simple: encourage potential rivals to engage in land-based conflict with one another (thereby keeping the rivals attention focused on immediate concerns, while at the same time reducing resources to build a navy), allowing it to control regional sea lanes. As such, UK in the 19th century was spared from the destruction of war, whilst giving it the opportunity to politically interference/influence (or provide direct aid where necessary) to maintain rivals in a delicate balance of power. If that failed to work, the final option was military – mostly through blockades of sea lanes.

STRATFOR argues that “[Lasting] empires are not created by someone deciding one day to build one.” Instead:

They emerge over time through a series of decisions having nothing to do with empire building, and frequently at the hands of people far more concerned with domestic issues than foreign policy. Paradoxically, leaders who consciously set out to build empires usually fail. Hitler is a prime example. His failure was that rather than ally with forces in the Soviet Union, he wished to govern directly, something that flowed from his ambitions for direct rule. Particularly at the beginning, the Roman and British empires were far less ambitious and far less conscious of where they were headed. They were primarily taking care of domestic affairs. They became involved in foreign policy as needed, following a strategy of controlling the seas while maintaining substantial ground forces able to prevail anywhere — but not everywhere at once — and a powerful alliance system based on supporting the ambitions of local powers against other local powers.

The limited choices available to the Obama administration (or whatever administration, whether it’s GOP or Dem) are dictated by the very existence of America as the “Elephant In The Room”, whether they like it or not. And these limited choices will guide the way America behaves towards rising powers like China, just like they did with Russia.

There are Obama supporters and opponents who also dream of the perfect balance: security for the United States achieved by not interfering in the affairs of others. They see foreign entanglements not as providing homeland security, but as generating threats to it. They do not understand that what they want, American prosperity without international risks, is by definition impossible. The U.S. economy is roughly 25 percent of the world’s economy. The American military controls the seas, not all at the same time, but anywhere it wishes at any given time. The United States also controls outer space. It is impossible for the United States not to intrude on the affairs of most countries in the world simply by virtue of its daily operations. The United States is an elephant that affects the world simply by being in the same room with it. The only way to not be an elephant is to shrink in size, and whether the United States would ever want this aside, decreasing power is harder to do than it might appear — and much more painful.

Obama’s challenge is managing U.S. power without decreasing its size and without imposing undue costs on it. This sounds like an attractive idea, but it ultimately won’t work: The United States cannot be what it is without attracting hostile attention. Actually, it is America’s presence — its very size — that intrudes on the world and generates hostility. Like that of Britain or Rome, U.S. grand strategy is driven by the sheer size of the national enterprise, a size achieved less through planning than by geography and history.

So what are the options available to the US? From the article:

First, the United States must maintain the balance of power in various regions in the world. It does this by supporting a range of powers, usually the weaker against the stronger. (Comment: i.e. the little island just to the bottom right of China where our boys are sent to lose their virginity) Ideally, this balance of power maintains itself without [too much] American effort and yields relative stability. But stability is secondary to keeping local powers focused on each other rather than on the United States: Stability is a rhetorical device, not a goal. The real U.S. interest lies in weakening and undermining emergent powers so they don’t ultimately rise to challenge American power. This is a strategy of nipping things in the bud.

Second, where emergent powers cannot be maintained through the regional balance of power, the United States has an interest in sharing the burden of containing it with other major powers. The United States will seek to use such coalitions either to intimidate the emerging power via economic power or, in extremis, via military power. (Comment: It’ll be a cold day in hell, or a clear day in Yangquan, when the US decides to close its bases in Japan, or for that matter, Sembawang)

Third, where it is impossible to build a coalition to coerce emerging powers, the United States must decide either to live with the emerging power, forge an alliance with it, or attack it unilaterally.

The interesting point from where we sit is not only how deeply embedded Obama is in U.S. grand strategy, but how deeply drawn he is into the unintended imperial enterprise that has dominated American foreign policy since the 1930s — an enterprise neither welcomed nor acknowledged by most Americans. Empires aren’t planned, at least not successful empires, as Hitler and Napoleon learned to their regret. Empires happen as the result of the sheer reality of power. The elephant in the room cannot stop being an elephant, nor can the smaller animals ignore him. No matter how courteous the elephant, it is his power — his capabilities — not his intentions that matter.

[Obama] came into the presidency promising to be more amiable than Bush, something not difficult given the circumstances. He is now trying to convert amiability into a coalition, a much harder thing to do. In the end, he will have to make hard decisions. In American foreign policy, however, the ideal strategy is always to buy time so as to let the bribes, bluffs and threats do their work. Obama himself probably doesn’t know what he will do; that will depend on circumstances. Letting events flow until they can no longer be tolerated is the essence of American grand strategy, a path Obama is following faithfully.

When we understand the choices available to the American Empire (make no mistake, that’s what the US is, whether it calls itself one or not), we understand where MM Lee is coming from. In his own inimitable way, he’s simply pointing out what should now be very obvious to us mere mortals: China is on its way to becoming an elephant, and the incumbent elephant in the room will do all it can – peaceful or otherwise – to trade time for risk.

It’s worthwhile pointing out STRATFOR’s own cheerful prediction of how such a strategy typically ends.

It should always be remembered that this long-standing American policy has frequently culminated in war, as with Wilson, Roosevelt, Truman, Johnson and Bush. It was Clinton’s watchful waiting to see how things played out, after all, that allowed al Qaeda the time to build and strike. But this is not a criticism of Clinton — U.S. strategy is to trade time for risk. Over time, the risk might lead to war anyway, but then again, it might not. If war does come, American power is still decisive, if not in creating peace, then certainly in wreaking havoc upon rising powers. And that is the foundation of empire.

Friday, November 6, 2009

20 AÑOS DE BARRO

          Fue un pequeño error burocrático producido durante una rueda de prensa la que abrió las fronteras de un mundo  totalmente desconocido hace veinte años, dando paso a momentos de euforia en mitad de un escenario optimista que no era más que un peligroso espejismo. El derrumbe soviético dio paso a un programa económico-ideológico, que a día de hoy está dando sobradas muestras de agotamiento y necesidad de recambio.

          Sin competidores a la vista, la carrera parecía ganada incluso antes de comenzar, pero la expansión del modelo occidental no ha cosechado los éxitos que en un principio se daban por hechos. Su avance hacia el este ha sido muy irregular, allanado por la inclusión en la UE de antiguos miembros del COMECON y el rudo desguace de la Yugoslavia paneslavista, sólo unos pocos Mc Donalds han logrado penetrar en el área zarista cuyas posiciones apenas han cambiado; basta recordar los problemas en Ucrania, Georgia y Chechenia, o las tensiones derivadas del gas, las maniobras militares en el Caribe, o el paraguas anti-misiles de la frontera polaca. Muy al contrario, los regalos envenenados como el de Rumanía o República Checa comienzan a cuestionar la impulsiva anatomía de la propia Unión. En Asia, el derrumbe de China nunca llegó a producirse y su engañosa apertura a la economía de mercado ha robustecido aún más su posición internacional, adaptándose como nadie al juego de la globalización y haciéndose presente en escenarios tan variados como Cuba o la República Democrática del Congo. También en Oriente Medio parecían abrirse horizontes inmejorables, pues aseguradas las bases de Turquía, Egipto y Arabia Saudí un amplio oasis estratégico nos recibía con los brazos abiertos tras las cómoda victoria en el conflicto entre Kuwait e Iraq, y la desaparición del proveedor soviético de lugares como Líbano o Palestina; ahora ya sólo hablamos de cómo poder salir de allí. Pero este embrollo no ha hecho más que multiplicarse con el surgimiento de un nuevo bloque de izquierdas contestatario en países de la América Latina con grandes recursos naturales, practicando la vieja e incómoda táctica de aquellas urticantes naciones no alineadas. La crisis económica es sin duda el último coletazo de un ciclo que empezó con el final de la guerra fría, y que se cierra ahora con el desplome del proyecto neo-liberal, engendrado precisamente en aquella noche de champán, luces y cascotes. ¿Alguien podría imaginarse algo así en aquel idílico 1989?

China Now has 40 US$ Billionaires - Forbes

Forbes China Rich List 2009 was released Thursday in Shanghai. Topping the list is 43-year-old Wang Chuanfu, president of the Shenzhen-based BYD Automobile Co. Ltd., his assets are worth 5.8 billion U.S. dollars, followed by Liu Yongxing at 5.5 billion U.S. dollars.

Top ten of Forbes China Rich List 2009:

Wang Chuanfu, 5.8 billion U.S. dollars, president of the Shenzhen-based BYD Automobile Co. Ltd.

Liu Yongxing, 5.5 billion U.S. dollars, president of East Hope Group
  
Zong Qinghou, 4.8 billion U.S. dollars, president of Hangzhou Wahaha Group Co. Ltd.

Lu Xiangyang, 4.1 billion U.S. dollars, president of Guangzhou Youngy Management & Investment Group Co. Ltd.

Yang Huiyan, 3.9 billion U.S. dollars, biggest shareholder of Country Garden

Xu Rongmao, 3.85 billion U.S. dollars, president of Shimao Group

Ma Huateng, 3.8 billion U.S. dollars, executive director and chairman of Tencent, Inc.

Liu Zhongtian, 3.79 billion U.S. dollars, president of China Zhongwang Holdings Ltd.

Zhang Jindong, 3.7 billion U.S. dollars, president of Suning Appliance

Wang Jianlin, 3.5 billion U.S. dollars, president of Dalian Wanda Group Co. Ltd.

Wang Chuanfu, Zong Qinghou, Lu Xiangyang, Liu Zhongtian, Wangjianlin’s family reached the top ten for the first time. However, Huang Guangyu, Liu Yonghao & family, Zhou Chengjian & family, Li Yanhong, Du Shuanghua and Zhou Furen & family from last year’s top ten didn’t make it to this year’s list.

According to the list, their total assets doubled from 52 billion U.S. dollars to 106 billion U.S. dollars owe to China’s Stock Market, in spite of global financial crisis.

In addition, the number of U.S. dollar billionaires in China has grown to 40 from the 24 last year, according to the list.

By People’s Daily Online

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

So Much More Than a Small Victory

Twice in the last two days I have had a student say something to me in Chinese and…..I knew what they were saying! OK, they are very simple phrases, but the point is that I heard them, and knew what the kid was saying to me. This was HUGE. Of course I am not suppose to answer in Chinese (like I could really do that anyway!) so I didn’t responded to them in English but man was I excited.

The funny thing is that one knew what I said back, did he have the same reaction I did, that we understood each other? Or was it, and I suspect this to be the more likely option, just another moment in the day that he will not remember by tomorrow? As for the other when I answered, I feel bad. I know that he did not understand my response. I was the person speaking gobbly gook. As that is a daily part of my life I felt for him, to ask a question and get a response in a language you don’t understand is just plain frustrating.

Here in China they like to keep saying it to you. They tell you something, cue dumbfounded confused look. I would think that the pulling back of my lips, raising my hands and shaking my head would be the international sign of “I don’t know” or “I don’t understand” but not here in China. They will say it to you again. Shake head again. Say again, only a little louder this time. This could go on three or four more times. I wish so badly I could say to them, “Oh, right, sorry I didn’t get it the first 4 times, now I do though”! Clearly I have no idea what they are saying but it won’t stop them from trying again and again to get me to understand it. By repeating the same thing over and over again.

There is the other part of surviving in China; linguistically at least. This is charades. I will challenge anyone when I get home, after this year, I am a pro. There is nothing like me speaking in English, while miming. Then getting a response with the person speaking in Chinese and miming. I am at this moment having trouble remembering a time when this has gotten me into trouble. If they can’t help that is one thing and that is a clear understanding. However usually we are able to get the point across. This is awesome. I also fear that after this year I will just speak with miming when I return. Because even at school when communicating with teachers or students my language is often accompanied with movements to make my meaning more clear. So I will apologize now if you encounter this in my first days or weeks home next year.

I will hold you in suspense no more here is what I can understand.
Zack “Nag ga ma?” (What is that?)
Zhuang Zhuang “Wo hao jag ga” (I don’t want this.)

OK, I can understand more then that, but these are the two cases in the classroom where Chinese was spoken to me by a child and I knew what they needed or wanted, amazing!

eBay

I have a reputation for not putting enough effort into describing items I sell on ebay, so this time I’m going to be very clear in describing the item.

The pictures above appear to be of some type of small child’s motorbike, possibly a minibike, yes, that’s what it looks like. However, this is one of those very rare Chinese made miniature motorcycles of which only about 56,785,920 were distributed world wide last year. The total lack of spare parts for these things has now convinced me that each child born in China was tasked with producing one of these; from a roll of aluminium foil and an empty ice cream container. That explains why each one is different. Not just different colours, but every single one is unique in its dimensions and spirit. Some have even been made inside-out.

Some of them have wheels which are almost round, mine doesn’t. The frame appears to be made of bamboo, painted silver to make it look stronger. When they gave the Chinese made boats the name Junk, I can now see why. Surely, one of the five year old kids tasked with building these things could weld. Every weld on the frame of this thing looks like a passing sparrow has splattered semi metallic poo on it, badly. Every bolt is a different size and the fact that it doesn’t change shape if left in the sunlight has amazed me.

I rode it once, that was enough. It was about as comfortable as pouring a cup full of leaf-cutting ants down my undies. Even though I’m so short that my feet are actually above my head, somehow riding this thing saw me wearing my ankles as earrings and trying to steer at the same time. Making things even worse was that it was like riding a chainsaw with wheels. The motor can rev like a cat with a clothes peg on its tail, making this little bike go faster than standing still – which is already a stretch of its safety envelope.

Before I took it for its one and only ride, I had to fill it up with fuel. I couldn’t understand how such a small machine could need such a large fuel tank, but then fifteen minutes after I’d put the fire out, I worked out why. The fuel leak from the carby was that severe that by the time I’d travelled 12 metres with my feet behind my head, the grass behind me was on fire. The leaking fuel had some how caught alight and although I was hoping it was a trail of burning rubber from its tyre shredding power, it was merely a small fire, not unlike a burning pipeline in Iraq. Fortunately, the fuel leak was so bad that by the time the fire caught up to the bike, there was nothing left to burn.

The bodywork on the bike isn’t even attached. I don’t know how it ever could be. There must have been a fight at the child labour factory when this thing was made, obviously the stronger five year old stole the bits that allowed this bike’s bodywork to be attached to its silver bamboo frame. So it just sits there making this thing even more ridiculous. You would expect that motorcycle bodywork would be made of plastic, true. But given the fact that this stuff a) didn’t burn and b) is as flexible as a Viagra induced erection, tells me that it is something from another planet, possibly China. I suspect that it may be some super organic, self regenerating rice paper or something.

Starting this bike is about as easy as getting a table of six for Yum Cha at 12pm. Despite the fuel gushing from the poor excuse for a carby, this thing has a pull start which has a cord about as long as a primary school play lunch. With the amount of fuel flooding from the carby, it requires full throttle to start. The first time I got it going it rode off with only the ghost of Chopstick Creek at the controls. I later learned that the best way to start it was by holding it under your arm and acting out an ACDC guitar riff before putting it back down, placing your ankles behind your ears and hoping that the thing stayed upright long enough for someone to get a photo.

On the bright side, this thing would make a fantastic garden ornament, because it has a miraculous ability to convert itself to important soil nutrients, like iron oxide, very quickly. You will notice that one of the front fork stanchions is all rusty. I didn’t do that in photoshop, it really is rooted. You will also notice that the steering is out of alignment, but what do you expect from child labour?

When the Trike of Death saw this little bike, it turned around in a very large circle and looked the other way. You have to feel sorry for this little machine, it’s like a puppy in a pound. Surely someone out there must have a good home for it? Lets face it, you can now buy something that has trodden the same ground as the legendary Trike of Death for less than the cost of a Trike of Death T shirt. You may even be able to convert this little thing into a candle, a hearing aid, a belt buckle or something else useful.

This monstrosity needs to go. Even if you buy it just for something to kick your toe on it would be worth it. You could paint it black and leave it on some stairs one night. You could create an artificial reef out of it, for one small and selfish fish. Whatever you do with it is your own business, just don’t tell anyone where it came from.

In response to some anticipated questions, here are the answers:

No, I don’t have a buy it now price, but if you can convince ebay to refund my listing fee, you can have it.

No, it doesn’t have a seat, the manufacturer didn’t design it to last long enough for your arse to make it to the where the seat would normally be.

No, it ran out of warranty on the third day, which was when it was somewhere in the middle of the Sea of China, on its way to infest the world with a good dose of unquality control.

Yes, I will deliver it to Anaheim California, it will only cost a return airfare ex Sydney and a Disneyland pass.

No, the brakes don’t work. It wasn’t designed to make it that far.

Yes, it is crap.

True, it does look good. So too do most celebrities until you see them in the flesh.

No, it wouldn’t be a nice gift for a six year old, or any other number between 1 and 1000.

No, there isn’t any spare parts available for it. They were designed around the same concept as disposable razors and toilet paper, not much good after the first use.

Yes, you are welcome to take it for a test ride after you buy it and then sell it to someone else who advertises it for sale and offers you a ride of it.

Questions and answers about this item

Q: Is the starting price a typo ? I’ll offer you 67c for it and you pay the postage.
A: The starting price was $6.99, which was my payment for writing the silly ad. Serious ads cost $12.80 so you should be thankful.

Q: Is the lead paint job in good shape? Are the plastic parts the same material they use in the dog food they export to the U.S.A.? How far are you from N.J.
A: The bike is painted in blue asbestos, cheaper than lead. The plastic in the dog food is far more nutritional than this rubbish. I’m a long way from NJ, but if the sale falls through, I’ll take in on a world tour.

Q: Serious suggestion Hollywood. Withdraw from sale and relist in eBay Nigeria. When the scammers win, send them the bike with a hefty postal charge. Should cure them of ever scamming again. Thanks for the laugh.
A: Thanks Chris. I just received an email from Nigeria where they have recommended that I invest in shares in this thing. Far out, I own it, how much more investment do I need.

Q: I was thinking this would be a good gift for my Ex-wife. However I am concerned about the gas mileage that her F@tA$$ would be getting. Could you tell how this will perform on fried rice? Also is a fart regenerator available?
A: The fuel economy will be improved once her r’s catches on fire and the fat starts to drip into the carby. It may just blow a little more smoke. The only modification this thing really needs is to be put on a train track.

Q: I am 73 and have a busted leg- does this qualify as a mobility device under Medicare? You must be the reincarnation of Mark Twain. I laughed until tears ran down my face. Thank you for making my day so enjoyable!
A: Enjoyable day – with a busted leg. You wait ’til I list my boat for sale, that will make you happy and it may just be what you need for your rehab. Good luck with straightening out coat hangers to scratch those itches.

Thanks to Whackingday